השפעת השחיתות במדינה המארחת על השקעה זרה ישירה

מוסד לימוד
מקצוע
מילות מפתח ,
שנת הגשה 2011
מספר מילים 3686
מספר מקורות 4

תקציר העבודה

ממ"ן 14
הקורס: ניהול בין לאומי תחום העבודה: תרבות של מדינות מארחות נושא העבודה: רמת שחיתות בממשלה שאלת המחקר: השפעת רמת השחיתות במדינה המארחת על השקעה זרה ישירה משתנה בלתי תלוי: שחיתות משתנה תלוי: השקעה זרה ישירה רשימה ביבליוגרפית:
1) Leon Zurawicki, Mohsin Habib(2010). Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment:  what have we learned? The international Business & Economics research journal. Volume 9, number  7, p 1. Abstract: Over
5 years of research pertaining to corruption and FDI rendered valid and interesting findings. We comment on these results to demonstrate that gradually the researchers develop a more detailed perspective on the significance of various dimensions of corruption and characteristics of the actors involved. Learning that corruption does not exert a uniform negative impact upon FDI, regardless of circumstances, leads to the formulation of the future research agenda.
2) Jung-Yeop Woo (2010). The Impact of corruption on a country’s FDI attractiveness: a panel data analysis, 1984-2004. Journal of international and area studies. Volume 17, number 2, p 71. Abstract:
Some argue that foreign investors would not be attracted to countries where uncertainty induced by arbitrariness in corruption, is pervasive. On the other hand, it is contended that MNEs have been seeking the investment opportunities where they can exploit rent benefits, so they would not mind paying a small price for the big gain. Consequentially, theory cannot provide us with the dominant framework to hypothesize the relationship between the corruption and the FDI attractiveness of host countries. Empirical results of this study suggest that corruption generally causes a harmful effect on attracting FDI.
3) Ali Al- Sadig (2009). The effects of corruption on FDI inflows. Cato journal. Volume 29, number 2, p 267.
Abstract:
The surge in foreign direct investment (FDI) flows during the 1990s has motivated a host of recent studies into their determinants. Recently, the level of corruption in the host country has been introduced as one factor among the determinants of FDI location. From a theoretical viewpoint, corruption — that is, paying bribes to corrupt government bureaucrats to get "favors" such as permits, investment licenses, tax assessments, and police protection — is generally viewed as an additional cost of doing business or a tax on profits. Motivated by these issues, the main objective of this article is to empirically reexamine the effects of corruption on FDI inflows by incorporating an econometric method based on panel data from 117
host countries over the period 1984-2004. The level of corruption in the host country has been introduced as one factor among the determinants of FDI location. Some empirical studies provide evidence of a negative link between corruption and FDI inflows, while others fail to find such a relationship.
4) Alvaro Cuervo- Cazzura (2006). Who cares about corruption? Journal of international business studies.  Volume 37, number 6, p 807.
Abstract:
This paper examines the impact of corruption on foreign direct investment (FDI).
It argues that corruption results not only in a reduction in FDI, but also in a change in the composition of country of origin of FDI.
It presents two key findings. First, corruption results in relatively lower FDI from countries that have signed the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. This suggests that laws against bribery abroad may act as a deterrent against engaging in corruption in foreign countries. Second, corruption results in relatively higher FDI from countries with high levels of corruption. This suggests that investors who have been exposed to bribery at home may not be deterred by corruption abroad, but instead seek countries where corruption is prevalent.